They continue to respond to post-conviction challenges by former NOPD officer Antoinette Frank.    Frank is trying to avoid the death sentence handed down after her conviction in a 1995 triple murder.    Prosecutors say Frank was helping her lover Roger Lacaze when she shot and killed two restaurant workers and a fellow NOPD officer during a robbery attempt.

 Frank’s attorneys have filed a petition to toss Frank’s  sentence arguing that she did not receive adequate defense. But Morrell claims the the former NOPD officer has taken too long and exhausted all of her appeal options already.    A judge will hear both sides at 9:00 a.m.  The call came in just before 2:00 in the morning. Officer down.

 Kim On Restaurant. Bullard Avenue. New Orleans East. When the first units pulled into that parking lot, they found exactly what you would expect at a scene like that. Flashing lights. A building that had gone quiet too fast. And an officer already there in full uniform, badge on her chest, standing in the dark like she had just arrived to help.

 She had not just arrived. She had never left. Three people were dead inside that restaurant. And the woman standing in that parking lot, the one who would spend the next several hours acting like a first responder, was the reason they were dead. This is not a story about a criminal who found a way past the system.

 This is a case about a system that ignored every warning it was given, and the three people who paid for that failure with their lives. Before we go any further, if you have watched this far and you are not subscribed yet, that is on you. Every case on this channel is researched, verified, and documented from court records and official findings.

 No filler. No speculation. Just the full truth of what happened. Hit subscribe and turn on the bell so you never miss a case drop. Now drop a comment right now and tell me where you are watching from and what time it is there. I read every single one. To understand what happened inside that restaurant on Bullard Avenue, you have to go back to where Antoinette Frank began.

 She was born on April 30th, 1971 in Opelousas, Louisiana. The second of four children raised by Adam and Mary Frank in conditions that federal health records would later describe in terms that left very little to the imagination. Her father, Adam Frank, was a Vietnam veteran receiving psychiatric treatment through the Veterans Administration.

 He was prescribed antipsychotic medication. As early as October 1973, VA clinical records documented him admitting to physically harming his 2-year-old daughter. A follow-up entry 14 days later noted the situation was not improving. It was getting worse. The VA formally recommended the children be removed from the home. That recommendation was never carried out.

Her mother, Mary Frank, later described the family as living in severe poverty. Her brother, Adam Frank Jr., grew up to become a fugitive wanted on two counts of attempted manslaughter and a probation violation. The home Antoinette grew up in was one that three independent mental health experts, after years of post-conviction evaluation, would formally identify as the direct source of lasting psychological damage.

Those experts reached the same diagnosis independently of one another. Their findings became part of the court record. Through all of it, one goal stayed fixed. She wanted to be a police officer. As a teenager, she joined the Opelousas Junior Police Program. Then the New Orleans Police Explorers Post 560.

 She graduated from Opelousas High School in May 1989, and on April 30th, 1991, her 20th birthday, she submitted her first application to the New Orleans Police Department. She failed the psychological examination. Rather than accept that result, she hired her own private psychiatrist, obtained a more favorable evaluation, and applied again.

What turned up during her second application in 1993 raised serious concerns. She submitted a recommendation letter bearing the signature of Mayor Sidney Barthelemy. The mayor later denied ever signing it. She had also been terminated from a Walmart in Opelousas for personality conflicts and told the NOPD she had been transferred, not fired.

 The department ran its own review. Its own investigator found both discrepancies and still rated her acceptable. Dr. Philip Schuria evaluated her across 14 characteristics relevant to police work and rated her unacceptable or below average on most of them. He specifically described her as shallow and superficial. His written recommendation to the department was direct. Do not hire.

 What happened next is where institutional failure becomes impossible to ignore. The New Orleans Police Department in the early 1990s was operating under pressure from two directions at once. The city was dealing with a severe crime wave, and the department was facing a critical staffing shortage.

 At the same time, it was under scrutiny over racial representation on the force. By 1993, 40 NOPD officers had been arrested as part of a widening corruption investigation. The department needed recruits. Antoinette Frank fit the profile it was looking for. She was hired on February 7th, 1993. Despite failing two separate psychiatric evaluations, she graduated near the top of her police academy class.

 On paper, she looked like exactly what the department needed. Her colleagues on the street, however, found her shy, slow to make decisions, and at times difficult to read. During the academy, her father reported her missing after finding a note she had left behind. In it, she described herself as feeling doomed since the day she was born.

 She came back. She finished. She received the badge. Author Chuck Hustmyre, who spent years documenting this case in his book Killer with a Badge, noted that the department’s internal findings were set aside without any formal explanation ever being recorded. The system had been warned. Twice. In writing.

 By its own people. It hired her anyway. By November 1994, Antoinette Frank had been on the force for less than 2 years. That month, she responded to a shooting call in New Orleans East. The victim was Rogers Lacaze, 18 years old, known in the area as a street-level drug dealer with a documented history of petty crime and violence.

Most officers would have taken the report and closed the file. Frank did not close the file. Frank later stated she had actually first met Lacaze around March 1994, roughly 8 months before that shooting call. The Department of Human Safety and Corrections investigator believed November 1994 was their first contact.

That discrepancy was never formally resolved. What is not disputed is what came next. Within weeks of that call, Lacaze was seen riding in Frank’s personal vehicle, a red and white Ford Torino. He was later spotted inside her marked patrol car at an active crime scene. When colleagues asked who he was, Frank told them he was her trainee.

 On other occasions, she introduced him as her nephew. Under formal questioning, she denied any personal relationship. Every single time. Investigators later confirmed otherwise. And it did not stop there. Witnesses testified that Frank and Lacaze were using her uniform and her marked patrol car to pull over drivers and rob them.

 These were documented allegations supported by witness accounts. Not one of those allegations was formally investigated while Frank remained on active duty. Then came February 4th, 1995. One month before everything fell apart, LaCase got into a confrontation at a party. Two men, John Stevens and Anthony Wallace, were leaving when a verbal altercation broke out.

 It turned physical. LaCase produced a TC-9 weapon. Former civil sheriff Ervin Bryant arrived and stepped in. Frank was standing right there. In full uniform. She told Bryant that LaCase was the good guy. She ordered him released. Bryant was never formally questioned. He never gave an official statement. The very next day, February 5th, 1995, Frank went to a Walmart and purchased 9-mm ammunition.

 When investigators later asked about it, her answer was straightforward. She was a police officer. She saw nothing unusual about the purchase. What investigators also discovered was that in the weeks before March 1995, a 9-mm Beretta pistol had been released from the NOPS own property and evidence room.

 The paperwork authorizing that release carried the signature of Judge Frank Morrell. The same Judge Frank Morrell who would later preside over both murder trials in this case. Morrell denied the signature was his. He told investigators it had been forged. The weapon was now on the street. Before March 4th, 1995 means anything, you need to understand what stood at 4952 Bullard Avenue in New Orleans East.

Nguyen Vu arrived in the United States in 1981, leaving Vietnam behind with one intention, to build something that would last. His wife, Noiet Vu, and their children followed a decade later in 1991. Together, they built the Kim Son Noodle House from nothing. A small Vietnamese restaurant with a grocery section attached. A neighborhood fixture.

 A family business held together by years of work and sacrifice. It was theirs. Every part of it. The family kept substantial cash on the premises. They distrusted banks. That was not a secret among people who worked there regularly. It was simply how the Vu family operated. And Antoinette Frank, who had worked security shifts at that restaurant, knew it.

 By March 1995, four of their children were working regular shifts there. Ha Vu was 24 years old. She had expressed her intention to enter religious life as a Catholic nun. Her younger brother, Quang Vu, was 17. He served as an altar boy at St. Bridget Catholic Church, played high school football, and had spoken openly about becoming a priest.

 Their sister, Chau Vu, was 23. Their brother, Quoc Vu, was 18. Also working that night was Vu Yi Vu, a 45-year-old waitress who had been with the family for years. The restaurant employed two off-duty NOPD officers for security. One of them was Antoinette Frank. The other was Ronald Austin Williams II. Everyone called him Ronnie.

 He was born on June 8th, 1969, and grew up in New Orleans East. He graduated from Brother Martin High School in 1987 and married his high school sweetheart, Mary Burris, whose family had lived directly across the street from his own. Their first son, Christopher, was born in 1989. Ronnie joined the New Orleans Police Department in 1991 and picked up the Kim Son security detail to supplement his income.

One week before March 4th, Mary gave birth to their second son, Patrick. Noyed Vu later told reporters she felt personally close to both Frank and Ronnie. She cooked meals for them herself. In her own words, they felt like friends and family. After his passing, Ronnie Williams’ name was inscribed on the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial in Washington, D.C.

 during National Police Week in 1996. But 1 week before March 4th, Ronnie pulled Chau aside. He told her directly that he did not trust Antoinette Frank. He said the only reason he had continued working alongside her was that other officers were rarely available for the detail. Chau heard every word. She would not forget a single one.

The evening of March 3rd, 1995 began like any other shift at the 7th District Police Station. At approximately 9:00 p.m., Antoinette Frank picked up the phone and called the Kim on restaurant. Chau Vu answered. Frank asked whether her security services were needed that night. Chau told her that Ronnie Williams was already there.

Frank said nothing more and ended the call. Her shift finished at 11:00 p.m. She left the precinct, went home, changed out of her uniform, and collected Rogers Lacaze. The two drove to the Kim on in Frank’s red and white Ford Torino. This was their first visit of the night. The stated purpose was straightforward.

Leftover food. Frank had used the same routine at the restaurant before. Was familiar. It was comfortable. And that night, it was cover. Frank went inside alone while Lacaze waited in the car. She ordered cold drinks, spoke with Noyed Vu and Ronnie Williams, and briefly brought Lacaze inside, introducing him as her nephew.

 She told them the two were heading out to a midnight movie. They finished their drinks and left. At 12:15 a.m., Frank called the restaurant again and placed a food order. She and Lacaze returned together for the second visit. At some point across these two visits, Frank took the front door key from Quoc Vu without him realizing it was gone.

 Trial evidence would later establish that Frank had planned this night in advance, using her insider knowledge of the restaurant’s layout, its closing routines, and exactly where the Vu family kept their cash on the premises. After the second visit, Noyet Vu decided to close early. Business had been slow that night. Before leaving, she placed $10,000 in cash on a table in the staff area.

 Money set aside for upcoming plumbing work and a planned parking lot expansion. She left the restaurant in the hands of her four children and Vu I Vu. Shortly before 2:00 a.m., Chau walked into the dining room to pay Ronnie Williams from the day’s receipts. That was when she looked toward the parking lot. The red and white Ford Torino was pulling back in for the third time.

 She remembered exactly what Ronnie had told her 1 week earlier. She did not hesitate. She took the $10,000 from the table and put it inside the microwave. Then she waited. Frank used the stolen key to enter through the front door. She moved through the restaurant quickly, directing Chau, Quoc, and Vu I Vu toward the kitchen.

 Ronnie Williams stood up from the bar and moved to follow them. He never made it. Rogers Lacaze had positioned himself at the rear of the building before Frank directed anyone toward the kitchen. When Ronnie Williams stood up from the bar and moved to follow the others, Lacaze intercepted him. Three shots were fired. Ronald Austin Williams II, 25 years old, 1 week into fatherhood, died on the floor of the restaurant he had shown up that night to protect.

Inside the kitchen, Chau Vu moved fast. She pulled her brother Quoc and Vu I Vu into the walk-in cooler, shut the door, and turned off the lights. Through the small glass window in the cooler door, Chau and Quoc watched as Frank moved through the kitchen carrying LaKaysha’s weapon, searching the areas where the family kept their cash.

 Frank also took the restaurant’s cordless phone from the bar. Every landline connection inside that building was now cut off. Ha Vu and Quang Vu had not reached the cooler in time. Frank and LaKaysha confronted them in the kitchen and demanded to know where the money was. Neither Ha nor Quang knew where Chau had hidden it.

Frank struck Quang trying to force an answer. When that produced nothing, she kept searching. She found the cash herself inside the microwave. Ha Vu and Quang Vu were both killed in that kitchen. The following morning, Noyed Vu returned to the restaurant and knelt on the floor of that same kitchen in the exact spot where her children had been found.

 A photograph of that moment was later published and became one of the most documented images connected to this case. Frank and LaKaysha left the building together. Frank drove LaKaysha to his brother’s apartment in Gretna. Within 45 minutes of leaving the Kim On, LaKaysha used Ronald Williams’ Chevron credit card to purchase $15 of gas at a station just three blocks from that apartment.

 Frank drove to the 7th District station. It was there that the dispatch came through on her portable radio. Officer down. Kim On Restaurant. Bullard Avenue. She got back in her car and drove to the scene. Lead homicide detective Eddie Rantz, who would later spend years working through every detail of that night, concluded that Frank’s motive extended well beyond the cash sitting in that microwave.

Based on his investigation, Rantz believed Frank had specifically targeted the Kim On because of a dispute over how the security payment was being divided between her and Ronnie Williams. Three people lost their lives over it. At 1:52 a.m., officers Wayne Farve and Reginald Jacques pulled into the parking lot of the Kim On Restaurant.

 A third unit followed carrying officer Yvette Farve. As they approached the building, Chau Vu came running out toward them. Seconds later, Antoinette Frank came out behind her. Not in her personal vehicle. In her official marked police patrol car. Badge visible. Presenting herself as a responding officer.

 In the presence of officer Yvette Farve, Frank turned to Chau and asked what had happened. Chau looked directly at her and said, “You saw what happened. You killed my brother and sister.” Detectives Eddie Rance and Marco D’Emma arrived shortly after and took control of the scene. They separated Frank and Chau immediately placing them at different tables inside the restaurant and questioning each of them independently.

 Frank’s account of events began to shift. When detective Rance presented her with one specific detail, the back door of the restaurant had been locked from the inside making it physically impossible for any outside individual to have entered or exited that way, her story changed completely. For the first time, she named Rogers LaCaze.

During the search of her person, investigators found a loaded .38 caliber revolver on her. This was despite Frank telling them she was unarmed. She was transported to police headquarters. With a tape recorder running, Frank gave a formal confession. She stated that LaCaze had shot Ronald Williams and that she had shot Ha and Quang Vu.

 She claimed LaCaze had forced her participation by threatening her life. Investigators pressed her on one point she could not answer. Her police radio, capable of reaching units across the entire district, had been in her private vehicle the whole time. At no point during what took place inside that restaurant had she used it to call for help, alert another unit, or raise any alarm. Not once.

Forensic analysis of the crime scene produced three independent findings. Ballistic testing confirmed the same 9-mm pistol was used in all three shootings. A boot print recovered from the scene matched Frank’s uniform boots. Blood was also found on her clothing. Frank was formally identified as one of the perpetrators by Chaw Vu and Kwok Vu.

The two survivors who had been inside the walk-in cooler and watched through the small glass window as everything unfolded in that kitchen. Rogers Lacaze was arrested later that night at his brother’s apartment in Gretna. He told investigators he had spent the evening at a local billiard hall. The owner confirmed he had not been there.

The morning of March 4th, 1995, New Orleans woke up to a press conference that stopped the city cold. Mayor Marc Morial and Police Superintendent Richard Pennington stood before reporters, both visibly shaken. Pennington confirmed the motive was robbery and that an undetermined amount of cash had been taken from the restaurant.

 Outside the courthouse that same day, Ronald Williams Sr. and his son Shawn Williams were photographed leaving after the initial proceedings. On April 28th, 1995, an Orleans Parish Grand Jury formally indicted both Antoinette Frank and Rogers Lacaze on three counts of first-degree murder. But the investigation did not stop at the Kim on.

 What came next raised questions that have never been fully answered. In 1993, 2 years before the murders, Frank had walked into an NOPD station and filed a missing person’s report. The person she reported missing was her own father, Adam Frank. She told investigators he had been staying with her at her home on Prentice Avenue and had disappeared without explanation.

 No search was conducted. No follow-up was opened. The report went cold. It did not resurface until after the trial. In November 1995, 1 month after Frank had been sentenced, a neighbor’s dog began digging persistently beneath the foundation of her house on Apprentice Avenue. Police responded and excavated the area.

 Human remains were recovered. Forensic examiners determined they belonged to a man approximately the same age as Adam Frank. Examination of the remains revealed evidence consistent with a single fatal injury to the skull. Formal DNA testing was never completed. No results were ever publicly confirmed. In a 2005 retrospective, author Chuck Hustmyre noted that in the decade since the remains were found, authorities had made no serious effort to formally identify them.

 No charges were ever filed. Frank was already on death row for three counts of first-degree murder. Then came the mental health evidence. Three independent experts, Dr. Sarah Dand, Dr. Leslie Lipowitz, and Dr. Frederick Saatzer, each evaluated Frank separately and each arrived at the same diagnosis. Post-traumatic stress disorder and dependent personality disorder, both directly linked to prolonged abuse beginning in early childhood.

 A fellow police recruit who had known both Frank and her father stated that the two interacted at social events in ways that those present found deeply inappropriate. Two jurors from Frank’s 1995 trial later submitted sworn affidavits to the court. Both stated the same thing. Had they been presented with this clinical background during the trial, they would not have recommended death. They would have voted for life.

Frank’s jury heard none of it. Not one mental health professional testified on her behalf at any point during the guilt phase or the penalty phase of her trial. Rogers Lacaize went to trial first. The case was heard before Judge Frank Morello in a 5-day bifurcated trial that ran from July 17th through July 21st, 1995.

Lead prosecutor Glenn Woods and co-prosecutor Elizabeth Teel presented the evidence in a methodical, deliberate sequence. They built the case piece by piece. The most decisive piece came down to a single transaction. Lecaze had used Ronald Williams Chevron credit card to purchase gas at a station in Gretna within minutes of leaving the Kim Anh restaurant.

 That one detail placed him at the scene, connected him to the victims, and put his alibi to rest. The jury found him guilty on all three counts. He was sentenced to death. Antoinette Frank’s trial began on September 5th, 1995, also before Judge Morello. It lasted 3 days. Early in the proceedings, the jury was taken on a physical walk-through of the Kim Anh restaurant.

 Detective Marco Demma led them through the kitchen and identified precisely where Ha Vu and Quang Vu had been found. The jury saw the space. They stood in it. Defense attorney Robert Jenkins had subpoenaed 39 witnesses. He called not one of them. His entire closing argument rested on placing the full weight of responsibility on Rogers Lecaze.

 The prosecution had an answer for that. The jury heard a recording of Frank’s own taped confession. Her own voice. Stating that she had shot Ha and Quang Vu. And prosecutor Elizabeth Teel addressed the defense argument head-on. Throughout the entire course of events inside that restaurant, Frank had possessed a loaded firearm and a fully functioning police radio. She used neither.

 Not to intervene. Not to call for help. Not to stop anything. The jury left to deliberate. They came back in 22 minutes. Guilty on all three counts of first-degree murder. At the time, it was the fastest verdict ever returned in a capital case in New Orleans history. And it carried a significance that extended beyond that courtroom.

 This was documented as the first known instance in the history of the New Orleans Police Department of an officer being accused of taking the life of a fellow officer. The following day, the same jury deliberated for 45 minutes before formally recommending the death penalty. On October 20th, 1995, Judge Morrell sentenced Antoinette Frank to death by lethal injection.

 She was transferred to the Louisiana Correctional Institute for women in St. Gabriel, Louisiana, where she became the only woman on the state’s death row. Glenn Woods, the lead prosecutor who built that case, still keeps a photograph of Ha and Quang Vu in his office. Elizabeth Teel has described these two trials as the most difficult of her entire career.

 If you have stayed with this documentary this far, you already know this case is not finished. 30 years of courtrooms, appeals, and legal battles, and there is still no final answer. Subscribe now and turn on the notification bell because what comes next in this case is still happening, and you will not want to find out about it late.

The conviction was final, but the legal fight was just beginning. In 2002, Lacaze’s attorneys appeared before the Louisiana Supreme Court and argued that his IQ of 71 qualified as intellectual disability, which would have affected his sentencing. The court rejected the argument. The recognized clinical threshold for mild intellectual disability is an IQ of 69 or below.

Lacaze did not meet it. In 2008, Frank’s conviction became final. In 2009, she filed her first post-conviction application containing 18 separate claims. Then in 2015, something significant happened on Lacaze’s side of the case. Retired Judge Michael Kirby issued a 128-page ruling and vacated Lacaze’s conviction entirely.

 The reason was a structural error in his original trial. One of the jurors, David Settle, was a commissioned state police officer at the time he served on that jury. Under Louisiana law at the time, that status legally disqualified him from jury service. Settle had concealed this fact during jury selection. Judge Kirby’s ruling acknowledged that the evidence of Lacaze’s guilt was overwhelming, but the structural error required a new trial regardless.

 Lacaze’s attorneys also raised a separate argument during post-conviction proceedings. They claimed a withheld witness statement suggested the second person present at the Kim on that night was not Lacaze at all, but Adam Frank Jr., Antoinette Frank’s own fugitive brother. This was never proven, but it was formally argued in court and became part of the official Kirby record.

 In January 2016, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal overturned Judge Kirby’s ruling. In 2019, the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed that decision under Orleans Parish District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro. Lacaze’s death sentence was subsequently commuted to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Rogers Lacaze is alive today.

 And in a development that adds another layer to this case, Leon Cannizzaro, the same district attorney who negotiated that sentence reduction in 2019, now serves as head of Attorney General Liz Murrill’s criminal division. He is directly involved in opposing Antoinette Frank’s current appeals. In 2023, Governor John Bel Edwards publicly stated his opposition to capital punishment.

 Frank’s clemency petition was one of five granted a formal hearing before the state parole board. The board voted two to two. Under Louisiana rules, a tied vote is a denial. Board member Alvin Roche Jr. voted against clemency citing Frank’s disciplinary record during her time in prison. In July 2024, Frank filed a new post-conviction supplement containing six additional claims.

 Her central argument was that Lacaze had held a weapon to her head and forced her to participate. She argued this information had been known to prosecutors at the time and was never disclosed to her defense. On April 28th, 2025, the state filed procedural objections. Prosecutors argued the 15-year gap between Frank’s 2009 application and her 2024 supplement had caused material prejudice.

 Key witnesses had passed away. Evidence had been lost. Records had been destroyed. On May 15th, 2025, Criminal District Judge Kim M. Holmes granted Frank a formal evidentiary hearing and rejected Attorney General Liz Murrill’s attempt to remove the case from Orleans Parish District Attorney Jason Williams. Murrill appealed.

 The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled five to two in her favor. That same period, in March 2025, Louisiana carried out its first execution in 15 years. Jesse Hoffman was put to death for a 1996 conviction. Antoinette Frank was not among those scheduled. Her active post-conviction review legally prevented any execution date from being set.

 On June 3rd, 2026, Frank, now 55 years old, appeared in Judge Holmes’ courtroom. Those present described her as composed throughout the proceedings, turning at points to acknowledge supporters seated behind her. Judge Holmes heard arguments on one central question, whether the 15-year gap between Frank’s filings legally bars her from seeking relief at all.

 A special investigator for the Attorney General’s office testified that when he examined the physical trial evidence, he found it stored in a single cardboard shipping box held by the Orleans clerk of court. Key items, including the 9 mm Beretta and photographs taken inside the restaurant, appeared to have gone missing from an evidence room that sustained damage during Hurricane Katrina.

 Frank’s lead counsel, Nyla Campbell, argued before the court that the state had placed responsibility on Frank for delays that were largely the result of the state’s own inaction over more than a decade. Judge Holmes gave both sides 30 days to submit final written briefs. Her ruling is scheduled for October 9th, 2026. As of this recording, that ruling has not been issued.

Some cases end in a courtroom. This one has not ended yet. Ronald Williams Sr. has attended every court proceeding connected to his son’s case since 1995. Every hearing. Every appeal. Every ruling. After the United States Supreme Court declined to hear LeKecia’s appeal, Williams Sr. spoke publicly.

 He said, “I’m glad to at least get to some finality, and I would very much appreciate getting some finality on Antoinette Frank’s case.” He is still waiting. Chau Vu has said publicly that March 4th, 1995 will stay with her for the rest of her life. At the Vu family home, there is an altar. On it sit portraits of Ha Vu, Quang Vu, and Ronnie Williams placed together.

Noyet Vu, the woman who once cooked meals for Antoinette Frank personally, later said, “They felt like friends and family, and they turn around and kill our family.” Nguyen Vu rebuilt the Kim Son restaurant twice. Once after March 4th, 1995, and again after Hurricane Katrina destroyed the Bullard Avenue location in 2005.

The restaurant now operates in Harahan. Antoinette Frank remains the only woman on Louisiana’s death row. A ruling that could determine whether her final appeals are even permitted to proceed is still pending. The man who fired first is alive serving life without parole. She is still waiting.

 Frank’s own legal team argue she was not willing. Two jurors signed sworn statements saying they would have decided differently with the full picture. The man who fired first is alive today. Does any of that change how you see this case or does what happened inside that restaurant settle it for you? Leave your answer in the comments.

 Tell me where you are watching from and what time it is there. I read every response. Subscribe now and turn on the bell. New cases drop every week. Do not find out about the next one late.